Articles on this Page
- 04/18/13--12:27: _Week 1 #ocTEL - it'...
- 04/30/13--09:53: _Embracing the chall...
- 05/01/13--09:39: _Catching Up #ocTEL
- 05/09/13--09:20: _#ocTEL Effective L...
- 06/12/13--08:24: _PUBLISHING: EVOLUTI...
- 07/02/13--10:26: _Why tweet from a co...
- 07/31/13--04:07: _ALT-S SIG Glasgow C...
- 08/01/13--03:36: _Getting to the Repo...
- 09/02/13--10:02: _Moocs, Music Festiv...
- 10/02/13--10:06: _Association for Lea...
- 10/08/13--03:50: _Dog food, fire hose...
- 10/13/13--12:21: _Future of Technolog...
- 11/06/13--23:42: _Gifford Lectures
- 11/17/13--12:37: _Professionalism and...
- 02/06/14--15:01: _ALT Strategy, NLS v...
- 04/01/14--10:47: _Do you know the imp...
- 04/03/14--10:17: _Effective Online Le...
- 04/18/14--01:54: _Open Scotland Webin...
- 05/05/14--07:24: _ocTEL Just dipping ...
- 05/06/14--05:34: _ocTEL activity: Re...
- 04/18/13--12:27: Week 1 #ocTEL - it's all very well but.....
- 04/30/13--09:53: Embracing the challenge #ocTEL
- 05/01/13--09:39: Catching Up #ocTEL
- 05/09/13--09:20: #ocTEL Effective Learning Resources - Global Citizenship
- 06/12/13--08:24: PUBLISHING: EVOLUTION, DISRUPTION & THE FUTURE #pubconf
- 07/02/13--10:26: Why tweet from a conference or event?
- 07/31/13--04:07: ALT-S SIG Glasgow Caledonian University - 20th June 2013
- 08/01/13--03:36: Getting to the Repository of the Future. RepositoryFringe2013
- 09/02/13--10:02: Moocs, Music Festivals and Cricket Matches
- 10/13/13--12:21: Future of Technology in Education conference #fote13
- 11/06/13--23:42: Gifford Lectures
- 02/06/14--15:01: ALT Strategy, NLS visit and Blipfoto focus #altc #nls #blipfoto
- 04/03/14--10:17: Effective Online Learning in the 21st Century - #BCS event
- 04/18/14--01:54: Open Scotland Webinar 2nd April 2014
- 05/05/14--07:24: ocTEL Just dipping in....... #ocTEL
Week 1 (2nd week) of ocTEL is focused on TEL Concepts and Approaches.
Using my usual filtering system, read the introduction and went to the 'if you only do one thing...' section. There are five 'stories' about how technology has enhanced learning - the task is to look at two that interest you, decide which is most powerful and relevant to you.
The first one I looked at was
'How Sugata Mitra designed a physical and social environment around computers so that young children would self-organise and teach themselves new skills through peer interaction and ‘emergent learning’ – watch Mitra’s 2010 keynote'
This is what I wrote on my blog at the time from the ALT conference 2010.
The key note speech after lunch by Sugata Mitra was fantastic. I have heard him speak before at the RSC Northern conference last year and it is really fascinating to see the videos of his 'experiments' with hole in then wall computers in India and other countries. It is interesting yet disconcerting to see and hear about his work in schools in Gateshead as it is close to home. It would be brilliant to instill that motivation and interest in all children and particularly in teenagers to strive to learn and for it to be cool to learn........
I can't remember why I was disconcerted at the time so decided to watch it again and see how I felt..
I think the reasons I had and have mixed feelings were because although it was different and extraordinary, it felt like an experiment. That the children will learn is to some extent predictable - they like finding out things, they are used to using computers, there was one each in the classroom in Gateshead. Once they've got the hang of the idea that this is a different context and they have freedom to do anything then they probably will - especially 10 year olds - they're at the ideal age to absorb stuff.
But does this motivation and willingness continue with teenagers? Sometimes, depends what they want to know, depends what they need to know, depends on the environment.
But my main thought is - hey, just a minute, we would all like to teach and indeed learn in a free and exploratory environment where you could learn what you want and spend hours learning about what you love, to find out interesting stuff. With no rules, with 'cheating', with no time restraints but it's not like that. It's all very well advocating inspirational and disruptive methods but at the end of the day the current education system requires children to learn what is needed to gain the qualifications they need to be successful. So change the system, change the curriculum, take the pressure off teachers so that they can do their best and then let children have freedom to learn.
I meant to do more work on this this evening and spend time looking at the other videos and look at others comments - but no more time. That's the problem - i could spend hours doing online learning stuff but work and life intervene - fortunately :)
The challenge is not the course, the course is fine - in fact as far as MOOCs and online courses are concerned, it's great. It's my engagement and progress that is the challenge because I am ticking all the boxes of a falling behind MOOC participant at the moment:
1. I have no idea where I'm up to with the course - Week 0 and Week 1 were ok - I managed to do some of the activities.
2. While saying that I have no idea, this is not strictly true as I know that I am not up to date, that I am definitely behind.
3. While knowing that the idea is to pick and choose activities, dip in and out and even to the extent that I have developed my own 'filtering system' to tackle MOOCs - I still feel slightly worried about my progress and not being up to date (years of conditioning presumably)
4. Struck by indecision - do I try to catch up or do I just forget it and start from what seems like this weeks 'only do one thing' activity?
5. Not only have I not done complete activities, I have done part activities i.e. I joined in the webinar last Wednesday for part of the time, have made some notes for a blog posting and not even finished writing up the blog.
In summary I have done a random number of incomplete activities
(due to too much work and too much socialising)
Luckily I am not entirely disheartened by this and am now going to go to the ocTEL website and do something - I think I will just pick something I like the look of.
There is very good advice by ocTEL to not worry about being behind but to "keep moving (and skipping, if necessary)". It is essential advice I would say for MOOCs because unless you are able to spend 24/7 participating then you are never going to be on top of everything.
But how do I and the millions of other people participating in MOOCs and online courses learn how to have the sort of mindset that copes effectively with never finishing, with never completing everything and with swirling around in a slightly bizarre world of information sharing?
Catching up with ocTEL by doing the following
1. Filling in expectations questionnaire
2. Looking at the results so far from the expectations questionnaire - it's very interesting to know what other participants are hoping to achieve from the course.
It's interesting but not surprising that many of the participants are those who already have experience using TEL and in fact probably work in education with technology.
I'm not sure how this will change in the future because unless it spreads to a wider audience then is it always going to be people who are 'known knowns' who are taking part and do they want to take part in order to learn for themselves or to learn in order to then encourage others to take part.
The themes of the 'big questions' is also interesting - I'm interested in quick wins, engagement and good practice examples which are common themes but also how to share information which is probably all of it.
ocTEL week 4 Effective learning resources
So I decided to search for useful resources in one of these areas to ‘identify appropriate digital resources, including text-based, multimedia and interactive, for particular learning contexts’ although I’m looking at it from a general HE perspective rather than a particular learning context.
The top result was a resource from the University of Southampton which was relevant and part of a course Teaching Citizenship in HE. There was lots of good resources although mainly text and images.
The top result was a link to a module entitled Enacting European Citizenship (ENACT).
It is part of a Money & Management course and wasn’t a learning resource.
All of the other results on the first page were part of the same module.
So I searched on the sidebar under education and the results showed a module Teaching citizenship: Work and the economy. Presumably to access the learning resources you have to enrol onto the module.
Search term ‘Global Citizenship’
This search produced lots of results although not millions. I filtered the search to include only those in the last year. I watched two or three and they were very interesting. There were quite a few TEDx ones.
How easy was it to find a relevant resource? It was easy to find the resources and I think that they were relevant because I managed to find course specific, sector specific resources as well as general ones.
Are there any limitations to the use of your preferred resource for your learners (e.g. copyright licence; login requirements)? The Open Learn resource required a login which you would do if you knew that you definitely needed that resource and had been directed to it but when browsing it’s probably a barrier.
PUBLISHING: EVOLUTION, DISRUPTION & THE FUTURE #pubconf
It was interesting to hear about the drop in circulation and readership of print newspapers. The readership has dropped dramatically in the last 5 years and the number of journalists employed by newspapers has decreased. Bill Jamieson called the cycle that means that some businesses survive in recession, Creative Destruction. This is part of the process of recreating the newspaper industry. But news continues to reign supreme - the demand for news has increased and the 'Have you heard?' question will never disappear.
When I attend a conference or event I try to tweet as much as possible for the following reasons:
1. As a record of what is happening for myself. I really don't want to be spending time writing or typing copious notes. This might be laziness but I want to concentrate on watching and listening to what's going on. However I need a summary of important points so use tweets for that then I can refer back to them later or storify them for a record.
2. As a record of what is happening for others. I like following other events via tweets with hashtags so hope that my tweets will be useful and interesting for people who can't attend.
3. To publicise the event and raise awareness of it. That's good for the event organisers and hopefully they will do the same for you. Also as a reminder that it is happening.
4. To find out who else is attending the conference - a quick way of checking out other delegates is to see who's tweeting - anyone you know or the people who are active tweeters.
5. To interact with others at the conference - retweet and reply. Sometimes it's a good ice breaker to meeting someone at a conference if you say that you've seen their tweets and thought you'd like to talk to them.
6. To share views and add that extra dimension or channel to the main event. It's interesting, and sometimes funny, to add comments and be able to be slightly less formal.
7. To ask questions or use a polling feature. At some events you can tweet a question to the organiser or moderators and then the presenter will answer that question.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
A belated blog about the ALT-S SIG Glasgow Caledonian University on 20th June 2013.
Yesterday I attended the first day of Repository Fringe 2013 and an afternoon workshop entitled Getting to the Repository of the Future. It was held at the University of Edinburgh Informatics Forum.
I haven't taken part in this event before and although not a repository expert, I am keen to find out more about the current situation regarding repositories and gain an informed general overview.
The room was laid out with 6 tables of approx 6 people ( there was another workshop session being held at the same time so this was a subset of the total attendees).
The session was introduced by Chris Awre who gave an overview of the context, background and aims of the day. He mentioned that repositories need to be used for a variety of purposes to include Research Data, OER, Digital assets, MOOCs etc. He raised some questions to be considered during the workshop:
There are many repositories in place but how do we support them?
There are lots of repositories and lots of services but where do we go now?
Institutions need to be responsive
If you work with a repository, are they still the right system for managing the institutions assets?
Staffing and skills requirements?
What tools will be used in the future?
There needs to be a collaborative approach and sector wide perspective.
Then Balviar Notay from Jisc talked about the current picture with an overview of the development of digital repositories by key strategic area. This included considering what the value is of a repository to an institution. In order to help address the question 'So what can we do now?' She gave some examples of pioneering ideas including:
Uni of Hull (Hydra)
Uni of Creative Arts - creative arts repositories (ePrints). Practioner based researchers work.
Middlesex MIRAGE 2D repository of MRI scans could be turned into 3D visualisations with embedded visualisation toolkit
In a sharing economy power is moving to the edges - are repositories at the edge?
Chris Awre then added the following questions to consider
How do repositories pay their keep?
Directly through exploitation? Indirectly through lowering of costs elsewhere?
What are the current trends that influence repositories?
Social - open learning, RDM, academic shifts in need/innovation
Technological - content centric development, system integration, usability, analytical
Legal issues - licensing
Environmental - relational to other systems VLE, shared library management systems, public engagement, preservation
We then had breakout sessions which consisted of discussions on our tables to look at 2yr, 5yr, 10yr predictions for repositories - Short, medium and long term. What is the future of the repository?
There was a good mix of people on our table with different levels of expertise and experience which made for a good discussion. We looked at the functionality of repositories - what should you be able to do with a repository?
(We did have a discussion about the actual word Repository and whether it is appropriate or relevant but in the absence of any other word........)
The main points we made were:
Other systems need to be able to pull information out of a repository easily - it should be an 'invisible repository' in a good way - transparent.
There should be an automated way of getting stuff into the repository - no need to input.
Enhanced discovery - easily searchable. Different ways of visualising - clever interfaces.
Publishers? Do we still want them in 10 years? Need to have more engagement. A better relationship with publishers should be part of the infrastructure providing more ingest.
Which institutions repository should a piece of work be stored in when co-authors?
More interaction with open access repositories? What are the incentives? There needs to be a change in culture.
Is it possible to get all the repositories or silos to talk to each other and then bring data together to send out into an interface that is usable?
There was then a feedback session when the groups fed back to the whole room. The main points raised were:
Functionality of repositories revolve round three main aspects - preservation, access and diversity.
Repositories should do less but better.
Automation of management.
Should the delivery of the content be offloaded to a delivery platform rather than being a function of the repository itself.
Who decides access and how?
Interoperability - add service layers.
Diversity of content - images, videos etc
Access to ephemeral content such as blogs
Organisationally there needs to be more integration with other systems and multiple systems. Fully integrated into people's workflow.
Governance and transparency - how much does the organisation want to invest?
Two good quotes of the day were
"If everything could be automated, then that would be great"
"The future is here, but not evenly distributed".
The summary of the day was that:
Repositories are good to draw stuff together and manage it - breadth of content will grow.
Who is driving? conflict between ownerships of content and repository and those who run the institution and the requirements
A lot of what we want to do is already known about but an uncertainty how to do it. So what are the barriers? Policy? Skills? If we could identify the barriers would this help?
This has been my immediate response to participating in MOOCs and I thought that although it wasn't exactly the same situation, there might be some common strategies that could be used?
You expect to hear a certain amount of jargon and soundbites in education and technology in order to attract attention and tap into the popular culture of the day. But sometimes you hear people using phrases and wonder what they are thinking and then later, when you go back and read your notes, it seems at best slightly odd and at worst ridiculous. Two phrases that I have heard over the last few weeks at technology / educational events are 'eating your own dog food' and 'drinking from the fire hose'. I'm not a popular culture person nor a marketing person so perhaps such calls to action are not relevant to me, but what does it mean and why were they said in the context of an academic environment.
I hesitantly googled 'eating your own dog food' and according to wikipedia ">Dogfooding can be a way for a company to demonstrate confidence in its own products. The idea is that if the company expects customers to buy its products, it should also be willing to use those products". It has been a phrase in common usage since 2007 although other alternatives have been suggested such as 'drinking your own champagne'.
Presumably in the context it was used it means that educational systems / initiatives / technologies should produce an environment for learning that the developers and policy makers would be confident and happy to use themselves?
Also in my notes from another day, I have 'Drinking from the firehose?' and 'Being agile in fast waters' so presumably there is a connection. Again I hesitantly googled 'drinking from the fire hose' - and I wished I hadn't as there were quite a few dodgy results aimed at 'male gamers' as you can imagine, but it does mean 'overwhelmed by information'. My question would be 'what is wrong with using 'information overload' in this instance? The use of both these phrases in an educational/academic/technology environment is disappointing as far as I'm concerned - who is it meant to appeal to? Is it meant to be cool or business like? Or funny...and I'm not getting the joke?
On a more serious note, I have recently heard three people suggesting that in order to get things done, it is better to seek forgiveness after the event rather than asking permission beforehand. Two of the people who have extolled this course of action are quite eminent in their field and I admire them for their success. But my first thoughts were 'how high up the ladder do you have to get before you can do that?' and 'It would be great to be able to do that'. My second thoughts were 'what would happen if everyone did that' and 'is asking permission sometimes a matter of seeking consensus?'.
The third time I've noted the phrase was in a blog about productivity when it was stated that the only way to get things done was to do them and then 'seek forgiveness' if it doesn't work. But surely it is a judgement call - if you see an opportunity and think it's going to work then you should take a risk and go for it. But what happens if it doesn't.......
Last Friday I attended the FoTE conference which was enjoyable and interesting. I attended in 2011 but didn't make it last year so was pleased to be able to shuffle work and travel and life to get there this time.
It is hosted by ULCC at Senate House, Uni of London. It's a beautiful building and has great memories for me as I used to spend hours in the library there in the 80s when I did my first degree at Kings College.
I like the event because it is for Learning Technologists and academics / teachers / educationalists who are involved and knowledgeable about learning technologies - it's not for the general overviewers but at the same time not cliquey. Also there is always a good back channel discussion via twitter.
The first speaker was Nicola Millard who is a futurologist. She was brilliant and engaging and talking about customers which is what I'm interested in. I do like an inspirational key note speaker to kick off an event, someone with an interesting take on the situation and with an appealing delivery. She talked about making things easy and effortless for customers and different sorts of effort such as cognitive effort. She mentioned email and that it would die out due to other channels being easier - not sure that I agree with that sweeping statement.....
A great point that she made was that you need 4 things in order to work - coffee, cake, connectivity and company. I agree entirely although would substitute tea for coffee. I think this idea is something library people should think about embracing - what sort of space is needed for you and for library users?
The next speaker was Alicia Wise from Elsevier who talked about Open Access. It was an interesting talk and quite difficult as the audience, I expect, are predominantly in favour of OA and see publishers as a barrier to it. But it was good to see them as part of the discussion.
The third speaker was Gwen Noteborn from Maastricht Uni talking about Webcasts in education: Mythbusters! It was ok and interesting but maybe covering old ground to some extent.
After the coffee break was the Fireside Chat with a real virtual fire in the background.
FOTE13 Fireside Speakers:
Yousuf Khan (Chair), Chief Information Officer, Hult International Business School
Adrian Ellison, Director of Information Technology, University of West London
Cathy Walsh, Principal and CEO, Barking & Dagenham College
Heidi Fraser-Krauss, Head of IT Services, University of York
Richard Maccabee, Head of ICT, University of London
There was some discussion around the idea that technology changes but working practices don't often change in order to develop along side. Again 'easiness' of using technology was mentioned - I agree in part, it has to accessible and available but I'm not sure it has to be simple - some of the appeal of technology is that it is challenging and complex - it can change the world, that is why it is enthralling.
After lunch Lindsay Jordan delivered a great presentation including a blue outfit and a piano. She talked about why people drop out of courses. Sustained learning needs motivation, organisation, self discipline - can we get these in an online environment? Possibly? She advocated face to face communication rather than email....again I would say it depends on the situation and the interaction.
Next presentation was by Martin King and was about diversity and connectivity - lots of interesting stuff.
Next presentation was from Kevin
Ashley from the Digital Curation Centre. He talked about the data deluge and the problem that we have is that the amount of data is outstripping the technology we have to store it.
After the coffee break, the final two presentations were about Moocs. Matt Yee-King and Marco Gillies talked about the Mooc that they created and delivered at Goldsmiths. It was a great insight into the practicalities of scaling up an online course and some of the issues and solutions they had encountered. This included changing deadlines which is easy for small cohorts but not for large numbers. Also the problems of negative comments on discussion forums - even if 1% make one comment, this can be large number of complaints.
The last presentation was by Diana Laurillard entitled The pedagogies for large-scale student guidance. The data from Moocs suggest that the majority of participants already have a degree or higher degree. This suggests that it is not for undergraduate study but for CPD. The drop out rates are high but registration is not the same as signing up. When scaling up the numbers involved in courses for Moocs, other factors have to be considered such as admin and support. Support costs are not going to go down but technology can innovate pedagogy. There needs to be investment in teacher innovation to make best use of resources and improve student outcomes.
All in all, it was a great day with lots of ideas to take away and reflect on. It's good to spend a day immersed in learning technology, listening and talking to people.
On the way back to the station I managed a very brief (10min) visit to the British Library - just time to stand and stare.
On Monday, T2 and I went to listen to Lord Williams deliver one of the Gifford Lectures.
The lecture was entitled Representing Reality and was about language and natural theology. It was very interesting and very complex. A great speaker obviously and so clever as it felt like you were being taken on a journey through an argument and it didn't matter if you didn't understand it all but it was utterly convincing.
The only part that I made a note of was:
Think to the edge of what can be said. The edge of descriptive language. There is no answer but a mode of consciousness which eludes characterisation.
The venue in New College, Uni of Edinburgh is beautiful and peaceful. T2 is doing Classics and Divinity now so often there. It's nice to spend time with him going to events like this although it does make us seem slightly nerdy as a family.
Professionalism and Engagement in Customer Service: M25 Customer Service Group Conference
I attended this event at Kings College, London University on 7th November 2013.
Before this event was advertised on various Jiscmail lists, I hadn't heard of the consortium or group so it was interesting to know of it's existence and their website with more information. http://www.m25lib.ac.uk/
I was keen to go to the event because of the venue as I did my first degree at Kings College in the 80s so it was an opportunity for a nostalgic visit.
After the introduction / welcome session, the first session was a keynote from Andrew McMillan, Principal Consultant at Engaging Solutions. He talked about staff engagement and the relevance of customer experience in libraries. He said that if you search for results about innovation then the results are about the physical space and digitisation but we should be concentrating on 'what it feels like' and the library space as a good space to work and a social space. Libraries can curate information and direct students to the information that is relevant.
The team is what is at the heart of customer service.
He gave quite a few examples from commercial companies with images and video clips. He gave the example of McDonald's, not as something to be recommended, but to illustrate the idea of a transactional relationship with customers. If we go down the digitisation route only and just supply resources then there is a danger that it becomes a transactional relationship.
His next example was of Harley Davidson (motorbikes) - they were in a market where they couldn't compete so in order to do so and survive, they focused on the feel of the brand and product. How people feel about the brand is important.
The customer experience is not just a product or service.
It is the channel - how easy are you to access?
The process - how easy are you to business with?
Concentrate on what it feels like - engagement.
This often involves a cultural and behavioural change for staff, it's about attitude and behaviour and training is not always the answer.
Take 'fluffy' customer engagement and make tangible - define, measure, communicate, reward, lead. Take care when recruiting and inducting new staff. Take pride in the brand you are representing. He did make some very good points as well as some that are more difficult to transfer into the environment of an academic library and the associated ethos and staffing e.g. Hire for attitude....fire for attitude
I do agree that libraries should focus more on being 'the place to be' and engaging and promoting themselves as 'wow' places. For me it is the space and the feel and the place that are as important, if not more important, than the resources. This is something for me to think about as you would think that people who are technology focused like myself would be less keen on the physical space, but this is not the case.
He also mentioned about management and leadership which gave me some points to think about before I try to articulate them.
These are the notes:
What you do (management)
The way you do it (leadership)
You should spend 20% of time talking to your team and
to be conscious of your behaviour because everybody else is.
Manage things, lead people
Set standards by example, coaching and encouragement
?s for all of us
What is your purpose?
Why do you work here?
Why did you choose your career?
What do you most enjoy?
(I also have 'role play...' in my notes - hmm, this one would be tricky with my team...)
Disengaged employees don't know what is expected of them - don't know what
Sue Downie then did a short presentation about the Institute of Customer Service and it's accreditation and training which was informative.
After lunch the focus was customer engagement. There were a series of quick presentations on innovative feedback methods and related topics. I thought this was a very useful part of the day.
large organisation so this needs to be taken into account when using social media. Use a response on twitter to diffuse problems. Learn about students needs and build relationships. Monitor hash tags Location services Be proactive.
Anna Knox, University of East London talked about their new library - the process of planning and consulting with students.
Wanted : More books and journals, Silent study rooms, More PCs, More group study rooms, 24 hr coffee
Didn't want : Noise, Food eating drinking, Broken equipment, Litter, Clutter/cramped spaces
They held focus groups and the responses showed (predictably?) that students wanted different things at different times. The architects presented draft plans to students and staff. They involved students in all stages of the process e.g. choosing furniture and fittings
Rob Wannerton, Brunel University
Talked about 'Changing the Story'. Traditional methods tend to be slow and take time.
She talked about how they 'Go Out and About' and this was really interesting - 'roving' outside the library. I've heard talks about this before (from Huddersfield??) and it is a great idea and useful to provide help at the point of need. They pre-advertise the sessions to ask students at various
locations on campus. You need to have a proactive approach to promotion of services and gathering feedback. Choose your audience - relaxed environments - groups rather than individuals.
Cards for students to fill in which have three questions:
Staff polite and professional?
Was the information or help you received useful?
They use the feedback to improve the service. I like this idea and have used something similar before for LRC feedback - why do you like the LRC? It sounds as if it is too vague or fluffy but students in my experience like filling in free text (paperbased) as a change from the constant electronic surveys they get sent.
There were refreshments and a further session but I had to leave early to make sure that i could catch my train.
And also to visit the Maughan Library http://www.kcl.ac.uk/library/visiting/maughan.aspx
It was a very interesting presentation and and highlighted many aspects of university league tables and student surveys that everyone is aware of and form an important part of the activities that we do. In advance everyone was asked to look at their institution’s league table position on the following websites plus your institutions NSS results.
The Guardian University Guide - http://www.theguardian.com/education/table/2013/jun/03/university-league-table-2014
The Good University Guide - http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/University_Guide/
The Times one seems to be the one thathas most impact, that most people look at.
Any improvements take time to manifest - it's cumulative and it takes time but sometimes you have to convince senior management that the improvements that you're making will impact on the position in the league table. It is also possible that when you improve, you increase points in the table but don't go up places.
Institutions use peer grouping to compare and benchmark with similar universities to address the problem that you're not comparing like with like eg UWS v Edinburgh. There is no scope to explain the background.
It's possible to use other statistics such as Unistats with Key Information Sets http://unistats.direct.gov.uk/
As far as the NSS is concerned....well it's a 'blunt instrument' and the library question is almost meaningless. It's based on what we think students value.
But it is what we've got and we have to make sure that we get the best results from it as possible. Participation is a challenge and each year, at each institution, various persuasive methods are used in order to encourage students to respond. I think we tread the line between survey fatigue and putting other more useful surveys or feedback on hold so that they don't distract from the NSS.
There is also theNSSE National Survey of Student Engagement which is focused on student engagement. http://nsse.iub.edu/
How do you know why or what makes you go up or down.
Making an impact through information skills SMILE @GCU.
There is also a mobile version of smile called smirk :)
The next presentation was also about information skills and was by Marion Kennedy and Catherine Ure who are Subject Librarians where I work at Heriot-Watt University.
Making an impact through information skills Power Hours @ Heriot-Watt
They explained that the Power Hours are about a variety of topics and delivered by staff across the University as well as in the Information Services. They are advertised in a variety of ways including leaflets and handouts, the website and via social media.
The impact is measured by attendance statistics and by anecdotal evidence. There is a feedback form at the end of each session which is analysed. 94% of participants agree /strongly agree that the Power Hours are useful to studies and research. This evidence is used to raise the profile of the sessions. Staff direct students to the sessions, academic staff request tailored sessions and also academics deliver some sessions.
The next two sessions were case studies based around Making an impact through space.
Firstly Margaret Buchan, Associate Director of Library Services, Robert Gordon University spoke about the new library at RGU. She explained what they used to do and how they had planned in advance to do things differently when they moved to 'The Tower'. There was no room for a traditional service / issue desk so they have a welcome desk instead which is staffed by reception staff. The reception staff were recruited for customer service skills not library skills experience. There are library staff on each of the other floors to help students on that floor and they communicate with staff in different areas via wireless headsets. There is no space for group study areas but they do have some provision for groups in another building.
An interesting aspect was that the staff area is 'hot desking' and this seemed to work well for them.
The next speaker was Laurence Bebbington, Acting University Librarian & Director, University of Aberdeen. He explained the concept of the Aberdeen Library with flexible spaces that are technology rich. It is a building of architectural merit with public spaces and a very impressive atrium. There is one dewey sequence throughout the library and plenty of study spaces with power and data on desks. There is a strong emphasis on self service including self collection of reservations.
During lunchtime there was an opportunity to look round the library. It is a very nice building and some great group study rooms.
The first session of the afternoon was a presentation by Graham Stone, Information Resources Manager/Senior Research Fellow, University of Huddersfield Library analytics: understanding impact and value.
It was a very interesting talk and I have read about the work that has been done on these projects. (My notes don't reflect how useful and informative the talk was).
Graham talked about how library data has been used at Huddersfield to improve existing services and how library data is 'linked' to student attainment. They found that there is a statistical significance between the final grade achieved, number of books borrowed and number of times e-resources were accessed.
In phase 2 of the project they are looking at library data and student demographics, discipline, retention, on/off campus and the breadth and depth of e resource usage. They are also looking at library usage by age and by country of domicile and how this affects retention. Does the depth and breadth of the library collection have impact on attainment? Non usage of library resources could indicate disengagement with workload and lack of performance.
Analytics are becoming a strategic priority within libraries / information services / universities.
Their current project is Jisc LAMP http://infteam.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2013/02/01/jisc-lamp-shedding-light-on-library-data-and-metrics/
They are looking for benefits of scale with future work and a shared library analytics service. Analytics dashboards and engines are the way forward with compelling visualisations.
The final two presentations were about Making an impact through resources. Robbie Ireland, University of Glasgow talked about Reading lists @Glasgow.
Then Lisa Haddow, Team Manager, Library Liaison & Development and Valerie Wells, Senior Subject Librarian, University of Stirling talked about Resource Lists @Stirling. Again they use Talis Aspire but the lists, and all the work, is done by the library staff. Students have dynamic up to date accurate lists. The list appears in the Blackboard course (as a resources list ). Academic staff don't have to manage the resource list but get statistics to show usage. The librarians use the list as a means of showing library resource usage and effectiveness. Their information strategy expects more than 80% of modules to have resources lists.
The whole day was great and I very much enjoyed it. It is organised by Dilys Young (Librarian and Assistant Director, University of Strathclyde) and Sonya Campbell (Customer Service Development Manager, GCU) who ensure that there are interesting speakers and well facilitated discussions. The pace of the event was quite fast, as there was lots to talk about and do, which suits me well. The last event in Edinburgh was also a very useful day and the attendees are all interesting and easy to talk to - great networking opportunities. If you are a library / information services person in Scotland, interested in customer services, i would recommend joining the group and attending an event.
The presentation was aboutTechnology Enhanced Learning and covered a variety of general and specific themes. It was all interesting, most of it covered topics and ideas that I am already aware of but the majority of the audience were not from education or academia so it was very relevant to them.
Technological and digital solutions to issues with online assessment
Learning Analytics to inform learning strategies
Ease of access
Technology has to be at heart of the solution - need to train people in IT
Take advantage of new possibilities. MOOCs disruptive (good and bad) - no attempt to save - sink or swim - online has poor success rates. Most MOOC learners already have degree so why is success rate so low?
Adaptive interfaces and personalisation of the environment
Engaging and immersive environments - relative depersonalisation of the learning experience but online learning has potential to provide a different range of learning experiences
Games provide social personalisation, progression at own pace, repetition and reinforcement
Socialisation - isolation but some people may feel more able to socialise online, need moderation, Minerva project
Personalisation - environment can be built to adapt to an individuals needs, can provide personalisation en masse, online systems can provide online feedback that is personalised.
Deterrents eg setting intermediate targets
Verifiable biometric authentication but not easy to put in all the measures
Attended this webinar
Lunchtime at work and just dipping in to see what's happening with ocTEL. ocTEL is an online course, a MOOC, being run by the Association for Learning Technology (ALT). This is the second running of the course (I did participate last time) and it consists of six weeks activities plus an induction week.
I'm not sure what the recommended time is to spend on the course activities each week is - I suspect about 5 hours but it is very flexible. There is also a 'If you only do one thing....... suggestion which helps if you are undecided what to do each week or feel overwhelmed with the many possibilities.
Anyhow as I'm short of time / too busy at work I'm going to spend half an hour a day skimming across the surface and see what happens. As usual when participating in a MOOC, I turn off any automatic notifications or membership of lists so that there is hardly anything coming through and then gradually turn them back on as required and as the course progresses. That initial enthusiasm when everyone contributes frequently and slightly manically, is too much for me. This may sound a little non-participatory but with MOOCs you have to find your own way of working and filtering and make a conscious choice about how it is going to work for you. I always follow the hashtag on twitter so if there is something urgent or in fact very interesting, I'll pick it up from there.
So straight to week 1 - Concepts and Strategies for Learning Technology.
A badge - a Check-in Badge. Great - I'm definitely one of those people motivated by badges - easily pleased or perhaps I like learning in small achievable chunks. I hope that is not true most of the time in my work but for this purpose, that's fine.
You also get a badge for completing the 'if you only do one thing....' and for participating in the webinar. So that's two more targets for this week - and the half hour is gone - until tomorrow.
A reflection on Learning Technology Strategies: